|
NaN's
Paul Schlie
(29 Oct 2005 15:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: NaN's
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(29 Oct 2005 16:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: NaN's
Paul Schlie
(29 Oct 2005 18:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: NaN's
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(29 Oct 2005 19:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: NaN's
Paul Schlie
(29 Oct 2005 22:49 UTC)
|
|
Error objects in general
bear
(29 Oct 2005 19:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(29 Oct 2005 20:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
bear
(30 Oct 2005 05:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(30 Oct 2005 14:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general Alan Watson (29 Oct 2005 21:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
bear
(30 Oct 2005 05:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Taylor Campbell
(30 Oct 2005 05:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
bear
(30 Oct 2005 06:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Taylor Campbell
(30 Oct 2005 16:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson
(30 Oct 2005 05:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
bear
(30 Oct 2005 06:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson
(30 Oct 2005 06:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Paul Schlie
(30 Oct 2005 12:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Paul Schlie
(30 Oct 2005 13:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
John.Cowan
(30 Oct 2005 16:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson
(30 Oct 2005 20:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson
(30 Oct 2005 13:17 UTC)
|
Re: Error objects in general Alan Watson 29 Oct 2005 21:26 UTC
bear wrote: > I think that when a "live" error object is stored or written, it > should be possible to read it back and get a value that says > an error object was stored or written. But what you read back > should be a "stale" error object, so you can tell the difference > between a "live" error and a "stored and recovered" error. Why is this useful? Regards, Alan -- Dr Alan Watson Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica Universidad Astronómico Nacional de México