Re: Error objects in general
Alan Watson 29 Oct 2005 21:26 UTC
bear wrote:
> I think that when a "live" error object is stored or written, it
> should be possible to read it back and get a value that says
> an error object was stored or written. But what you read back
> should be a "stale" error object, so you can tell the difference
> between a "live" error and a "stored and recovered" error.
Why is this useful?
Regards,
Alan
--
Dr Alan Watson
Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica
Universidad Astronómico Nacional de México