Some comments relating to ICFP contest
Andre van Tonder
(25 Jul 2006 20:25 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
Alex Shinn
(26 Jul 2006 02:04 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
Michael Sperber
(26 Jul 2006 05:03 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
Alan Watson
(26 Jul 2006 08:40 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber (26 Jul 2006 09:02 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
bear
(04 Sep 2006 17:31 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
Andre van Tonder
(26 Jul 2006 15:12 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
Michael Sperber
(26 Jul 2006 15:35 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
Andre van Tonder
(26 Jul 2006 16:23 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest
Michael Sperber
(27 Jul 2006 15:51 UTC)
|
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber 26 Jul 2006 09:02 UTC
"Alan Watson" <xxxxxx@astrosmo.unam.mx> writes: > Consider data types with 32 bits and 64 bits but which are not > numbers in the sense that the generic arithmetic operations cannot > be used with them without an explicit conversion. Appropriate type- > specific arithmetic and logical operations could be defined for > these types. This would not be especially difficult to implement in > a well-designed Scheme. Yes, and SRFI 77 gives you the machinery to implement that. (In fact, the reference implementation does precisely that for the fixnums.) But it's a whole different ballgame from the "unified" number system of SRFI 77 (in the sense that fixnums are exact integers and flonums are inexact reals). -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla