Some comments relating to ICFP contest Andre van Tonder (25 Jul 2006 20:25 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Alex Shinn (26 Jul 2006 02:04 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber (26 Jul 2006 05:03 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Alan Watson (26 Jul 2006 08:40 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber (26 Jul 2006 09:02 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest bear (04 Sep 2006 17:31 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Andre van Tonder (26 Jul 2006 15:12 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber (26 Jul 2006 15:35 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Andre van Tonder (26 Jul 2006 16:23 UTC)
Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber (27 Jul 2006 15:51 UTC)

Re: Some comments relating to ICFP contest Michael Sperber 26 Jul 2006 15:32 UTC

Andre van Tonder <xxxxxx@now.het.brown.edu> writes:

> Conceded.  But the context of my comment was efficiency.  How likely
> is it that implementations will compile the expression (exact-and (* x
> y) #xFFFFFFFF) to the single machine instruction available on many
> architectures?

I would think it's about as likely as a "32-bit type" doing the same
thing.  On a 32-bit architecture, if your values are tagged, ...

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla