Joo ChurlSoo <xxxxxx@iniTerm.com> writes:

>  |Why to introduce MU if we already have LIST for packing multiple
>  |values in a single value?
>
> Because decomposition of multiple values of MU is simple and rapid.

Decomposition of x when it's a MU:
   (x proc)
and when it's a list:
   (apply proc x)
for exactly the same proc. The difference doesn't warrant introducing
a new sequence type and learning when to use MU and when to use a list.

--
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       xxxxxx@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/