Re: order of evaluation Joo ChurlSoo 06 Apr 2006 10:28 UTC
* From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
| Joo ChurlSoo <xxxxxx@iniTerm.com> writes:
>> Although MU* can be substituted for MU and NU, MU* is much slower than MU.
| This is not true: it depends on the implementation.
| Also the semantics is different: the result of MU evaluates arguments
| each time it is unpacked. Are you sure this is what you intended?
If MU is defined as a procedure with the same speed or better, I'll use it.