* From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <xxxxxx@knm.org.pl>
 | Joo ChurlSoo <xxxxxx@iniTerm.com> writes:
   >> Although MU* can be substituted for MU and NU, MU* is much slower than MU.
 | This is not true: it depends on the implementation.
 | Also the semantics is different: the result of MU evaluates arguments
 | each time it is unpacked. Are you sure this is what you intended?

If MU is defined as a procedure with the same speed or better, I'll use it.

--
Joo ChurlSoo