|
Re: complexity of mechanism
felix winkelmann
(12 Apr 2006 19:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
Eli Barzilay
(12 Apr 2006 20:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
felix winkelmann
(13 Apr 2006 06:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
Eli Barzilay
(13 Apr 2006 07:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism felix winkelmann (13 Apr 2006 08:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
Eli Barzilay
(13 Apr 2006 08:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
felix winkelmann
(13 Apr 2006 09:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
John Cowan
(13 Apr 2006 11:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
John Cowan
(13 Apr 2006 11:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
Eli Barzilay
(13 Apr 2006 12:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
felix winkelmann
(13 Apr 2006 13:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
Eli Barzilay
(13 Apr 2006 13:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: complexity of mechanism
feeley
(13 Apr 2006 14:07 UTC)
|
On 4/13/06, Eli Barzilay <xxxxxx@barzilay.org> wrote: > > > [...] It's just to easy to put a keyword-enabled interface onto > > everything. [...] > > and that's a very good argument for this srfi. It seems you're trying violently to misunderstand me: it's *too* easy: you quickly end up with a small set of functions with loads of keyword parameters and yet another open manual to consult. cheers, felix
