Re: Underscores in numbers for legibility
Per Bothner 13 Apr 2019 16:00 UTC
On 4/13/19 12:27 AM, Lassi Kortela wrote:
> I'm starting to realize why Common Lisp reserving "potential numbers" from the get-go was a wise move. (Though they specified it so that potential numbers parse as symbols in implementations which can't handle them, which may not have been as wise.)
Not according to my reading of the HyperSpec:
"Any token that is a potential number but does not fit the number syntax
is a reserved token and has an implementation-dependent interpretation."
--
--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
