|
macroexpand SRFI? Lassi Kortela (03 Oct 2019 15:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(03 Oct 2019 15:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(03 Oct 2019 18:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
John Cowan
(03 Oct 2019 20:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(03 Oct 2019 20:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Lassi Kortela
(04 Oct 2019 10:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(04 Oct 2019 07:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(04 Oct 2019 08:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Shiro Kawai
(04 Oct 2019 10:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Shiro Kawai
(04 Oct 2019 10:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Lassi Kortela
(04 Oct 2019 14:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: macroexpand SRFI?
Amirouche Boubekki
(04 Oct 2019 09:18 UTC)
|
|
How hard is a portable macroexpand only for display purposes?
Lassi Kortela
(04 Oct 2019 10:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: How hard is a portable macroexpand only for display purposes?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(04 Oct 2019 11:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: How hard is a portable macroexpand only for display purposes?
Lassi Kortela
(04 Oct 2019 14:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: How hard is a portable macroexpand only for display purposes?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(04 Oct 2019 15:01 UTC)
|
macroexpand SRFI? Lassi Kortela 03 Oct 2019 15:30 UTC
Has someone here by chance written a pre-SRFI for macroexpand (or macro-expand, syntax-expand, etc.)? Would be nice to have a standard way to find out what code your macros expand to. Since Scheme has several macro systems (syntax-rules, syntax-case, CL-style define-macro, maybe others?) does that complicate the interface of a macroexpander, or is the complexity all in the internals?