Level of SRFI traffic at the moment Lassi Kortela (24 Oct 2019 08:00 UTC)
|
Re: Level of SRFI traffic at the moment
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 Oct 2019 09:49 UTC)
|
Re: Level of SRFI traffic at the moment
John Cowan
(24 Oct 2019 13:30 UTC)
|
Re: Level of SRFI traffic at the moment
Lassi Kortela
(24 Oct 2019 13:55 UTC)
|
Re: Level of SRFI traffic at the moment
John Cowan
(24 Oct 2019 16:46 UTC)
|
Re: Level of SRFI traffic at the moment
Amirouche Boubekki
(25 Oct 2019 10:40 UTC)
|
Re: Level of SRFI traffic at the moment
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Oct 2019 19:49 UTC)
|
Re: Level of SRFI traffic at the moment
John Cowan
(24 Oct 2019 19:54 UTC)
|
Re: Level of SRFI traffic at the moment
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Oct 2019 17:31 UTC)
|
Level of SRFI traffic at the moment Lassi Kortela 24 Oct 2019 08:00 UTC
How does everyone feel about the pace of discussion right now? I could send some more SRFIs before the end of the year but if people are overloaded or weary with the current pace, I can postpone them. The most important topic would be library lookup and packaging which I think is the biggest impediment to portable and convenient Scheme usage right now. A `#! /usr/bin/env scheme-script` that supports all Scheme implementations as well as the library/packaging standard would also be pertinent. As with keywords, a long and involved discussion is needed.