Re: Introspection
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 May 2020 07:11 UTC)
|
Multiple-values SRFI
Lassi Kortela
(11 May 2020 09:09 UTC)
|
Re: Multiple-values SRFI
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 May 2020 09:41 UTC)
|
Re: Multiple-values SRFI
Lassi Kortela
(11 May 2020 10:52 UTC)
|
Re: Multiple-values SRFI
Lassi Kortela
(11 May 2020 11:04 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
John Cowan
(11 May 2020 18:02 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 May 2020 18:26 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection Marc Feeley (11 May 2020 18:34 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 May 2020 19:29 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Marc Feeley
(12 May 2020 04:15 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
John Cowan
(12 May 2020 15:36 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Lassi Kortela
(12 May 2020 16:07 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
John Cowan
(12 May 2020 18:19 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Lassi Kortela
(12 May 2020 18:46 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(04 Jun 2020 16:39 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2020 08:38 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
John Cowan
(09 Jun 2020 17:53 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Jun 2020 19:39 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
John Cowan
(10 Jun 2020 21:46 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 Jun 2020 11:55 UTC)
|
Re: Introspection
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(04 Jun 2020 16:36 UTC)
|
> On May 11, 2020, at 2:02 PM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote: > > I agree that the proposed SRFI is an excellent idea, especially with the additional macros to go from lists/vectors to multiple values. Indeed, given such a SRFI, I question whether SRFI 195 actually adds anything. It seems simpler just to continue to restrict boxes to hold a single object which can be converted to and from multiple values. +1 Marc