Am Mo., 11. Mai 2020 um 20:34 Uhr schrieb Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@iro.umontreal.ca>:
>
> > On May 11, 2020, at 2:02 PM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that the proposed SRFI is an excellent idea, especially with the additional macros to go from lists/vectors to multiple values.  Indeed, given such a SRFI, I question whether SRFI 195 actually adds anything.   It seems simpler just to continue to restrict boxes to hold a single object which can be converted to and from multiple values.

Restricting something usually makes things more complicated, says the
mathematician.

>
> +1
>
> Marc
>
>