> On May 11, 2020, at 2:02 PM, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
>
> I agree that the proposed SRFI is an excellent idea, especially with the additional macros to go from lists/vectors to multiple values.  Indeed, given such a SRFI, I question whether SRFI 195 actually adds anything.   It seems simpler just to continue to restrict boxes to hold a single object which can be converted to and from multiple values.

+1

Marc