|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition Lassi Kortela (13 May 2020 20:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2020 21:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
John Cowan
(13 May 2020 23:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 May 2020 00:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 May 2020 00:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
John Cowan
(14 May 2020 00:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 May 2020 00:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
John Cowan
(14 May 2020 00:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 May 2020 00:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arne Babenhauserheide
(14 May 2020 04:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Lassi Kortela
(14 May 2020 07:33 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition Lassi Kortela 13 May 2020 20:19 UTC
>> I see Generators (SRFI-121) marked as withdrawn and as Red. Is that >> correct? > SRFI 121 was replaced in Tangerine by SRFI 158, so yes: it is withdrawn, > it is part of Red, it is not part of R7RS-large today. I suggest we keep the r7rs-large-red keyword intact in the SRFI database and coin a new r7rs-large keyword covering the final version of the entire language once we have it. Just sent a similar pull request covering Tangerine Edition.