Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Lassi Kortela
(13 May 2020 20:19 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 May 2020 21:51 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
John Cowan
(13 May 2020 23:55 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 May 2020 00:18 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 May 2020 00:21 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
John Cowan
(14 May 2020 00:22 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 May 2020 00:26 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
John Cowan
(14 May 2020 00:40 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 May 2020 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition Arne Babenhauserheide (14 May 2020 04:52 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition
Lassi Kortela
(14 May 2020 07:33 UTC)
|
Re: keywords for R7RS Large, Red Edition Arne Babenhauserheide 14 May 2020 04:52 UTC
Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> writes: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:55 PM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote: >> I would say: use r7rs-large to tag everything that's currently part of >> R7RS-large and be prepared to remove that tag from SRFIs that are >> superseded. > https://srfi.schemers.org/?keywords=r7rs-large > I must say that that's already an impressive body of work. I agree — and it is exactly what I was missing when working on Scheme! Thank you very much for your work! Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken