Le dim. 14 juin 2020 à 12:41, Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> a écrit :

> It might be clearest to have two general-purpose lists:
>
> * srfi-process
> * srfi-ideas
>
> The name "srfi-discuss" is sufficiently generic (probably for historical
> reasons, if it was the first list that was made) that it sometimes
> misleads people about its purpose. Would it be technically difficult to
> rename it to "srfi-process" (keeping some kind of redirect mechanism so
> that mails sent to xxxxxx@ still end up at xxxxxx@)?
>
> Not sure whether "ideas" should be included in auto-subscribe.
> Discussion would probably not be as focused as on the other lists.

I think it would be better to have a single srfi-offtopic mailing list, in order
to avoid creating too many mailing lists that are not alive and that we forget
the existence.  The idea of the offtopic mailing would be to gather everything
that does not really go into the other mailing list as a fallback mechanism.

Maybe offtopic is the wrong name.

My point is that too many mailing list is not good.

And for what it is worth, if I had to choose I would only use
srfi-discuss and srfi-n specific mailing lists.

--
Amirouche ~ https://hyper.dev