How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft
John Cowan
(09 Aug 2020 17:35 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft
Lassi Kortela
(09 Aug 2020 17:51 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft
Lassi Kortela
(09 Aug 2020 17:54 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft
John Cowan
(09 Aug 2020 18:01 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft
Lassi Kortela
(09 Aug 2020 18:23 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft
(no sender)
(09 Aug 2020 19:14 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft
Lassi Kortela
(09 Aug 2020 19:35 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft hga@xxxxxx (09 Aug 2020 19:55 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft
Arthur A. Gleckler
(09 Aug 2020 21:39 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft
(no sender)
(18 Aug 2020 06:53 UTC)
|
Re: How to decide when to declare a new SRFI draft hga@xxxxxx 09 Aug 2020 19:55 UTC
> From: Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> > Date: Sunday, August 09, 2020 2:35 PM > > [ A subdraft idea, good in the best of all possible worlds: ] > > [...] Sub-draft 3 would be marked something like this: > > * Draft #3 published: 2020-07-18 > * (Draft #3.2 published: 2020-07-20) > * (Draft #3.3 published: 2020-07-27) > > When draft #4 is published, those parenthesized lines would be deleted. > > [...] > > At this point (no pun intended) we should stop to consider what is too > much work for Arthur as the editor.... That's my objection to increasing the number and pace of drafts. The way I try to informally handle it is to try to keep clear in the email discussion list which repo is the current most up to date, and I provide a link to it when it's mine. Not authoritative as such, but reflects the current thinking about the SRFI. Not sure there's often going to be two different authors updating the raw SRFI text at the same time due to the repo coordination issues that can create. Not a good solution by itself for someone who's just joining an SRFI effort, and we *really* want to support those people. - Harold