> My opinion, and it may be Alex's opinion too, is that SRFI 64 is
> seriously bloated.  Making it even more bloated is Not The Way, Grasshopper.

Well, one person's bloated is another's full-featured. We'll never reach
agreement, it's been tried -- SRFI 64 is 14 years old.

Since we can't agree on the runners, let's be practical and concentrate
on universalizing the test definitions part, which we already almost
agree on already.

> Rather, let's look at the Chibi/Chicken library and consider how it
> should be standardized.

That library is practically identical to the test definition part of
SRFI 64. We're in a good situation, let's keep it that way!