SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
noosphere@xxxxxx
(08 Nov 2020 21:50 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
Vladimir Nikishkin
(09 Nov 2020 01:00 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2020 09:41 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
noosphere@xxxxxx
(09 Nov 2020 16:15 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2020 16:36 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
noosphere@xxxxxx
(09 Nov 2020 20:35 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2020 20:57 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2020 21:05 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
noosphere@xxxxxx
(09 Nov 2020 23:41 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI? Lassi Kortela (10 Nov 2020 07:53 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
noosphere@xxxxxx
(09 Nov 2020 23:45 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
noosphere@xxxxxx
(09 Nov 2020 20:50 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI-metadata-syncing SRFI?
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2020 21:12 UTC)
|
||
The funnel pattern
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2020 21:30 UTC)
|
> I have no problem with that, but I expect various people to just want > to do their own thing. Some will want to get the data from the > aggregator, others will also prefer to go to the source. Agreed. It doesn't matter where people get the data. If the stream flows one way, they can get it at any point in the stream that is convenient to them. > The best an aggregator can do is publish their own aggregated results in > a well-defined format and publicize them. Exactly.