|
(Previous discussion continued)
|
||
|
licenses for pre-existing sample implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(21 Feb 2021 23:15 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(22 Feb 2021 07:46 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations
hga@xxxxxx
(22 Feb 2021 11:34 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(22 Feb 2021 12:20 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations
hga@xxxxxx
(22 Feb 2021 13:23 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations Lassi Kortela (22 Feb 2021 13:40 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(22 Feb 2021 13:44 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations
Vladimir Nikishkin
(22 Feb 2021 13:54 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(22 Feb 2021 16:55 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations
John Cowan
(25 Feb 2021 05:07 UTC)
|
||
Re: licenses for pre-existing sample implementations Lassi Kortela 22 Feb 2021 13:40 UTC
In license debates it would be good for both sides to remember that you cannot reason people out of something they were not reasoned into. There's scant objective evidence for one side or another. The fundamental disagreement is over personal differences in risk assessment, priorities, personality, and overall worldview.