> I think that ship has sailed.  If anything, create xxxxxx@ for
> actual discussions of the SRFI process.  Most of the traffic on
> srfi-discuss is related to SRFIs, after all, directly or indirectly, so
> it's not *fundamentally* off-topic.

IIRC I suggested making such a list a few months back, but it was
decided that having two lists for general discussion around SRFI is too
much.

Agreed that it's hard to separate SRFI discussion from non-SRFI
discussion since SRFI is so deeply tied to all aspects of Scheme, and
since R6RS the separation between the SRFI and RnRS design processes is
intentionally blurry.