Re: volume of discussion Lassi Kortela 01 May 2021 20:47 UTC
> I think that ship has sailed. If anything, create xxxxxx@ for > actual discussions of the SRFI process. Most of the traffic on > srfi-discuss is related to SRFIs, after all, directly or indirectly, so > it's not *fundamentally* off-topic. IIRC I suggested making such a list a few months back, but it was decided that having two lists for general discussion around SRFI is too much. Agreed that it's hard to separate SRFI discussion from non-SRFI discussion since SRFI is so deeply tied to all aspects of Scheme, and since R6RS the separation between the SRFI and RnRS design processes is intentionally blurry.