Re: Unicode lambda revisited Daphne Preston-Kendal 16 Aug 2021 21:03 UTC

On 16 Aug 2021, at 17:49, John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:

> So the practical alternative is #?...?, where ? is some character or pair of characters.   #"..." is the obvious, but it has also been proposed by SRFI 207 bytestrings.  This is exactly why I want to keep all lexical issues for the end.

No, SRFI 207 says #u8"…". #"…" remains unused, to my knowledge.

Daphne