Iteration revisited
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(25 Oct 2021 06:30 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(25 Oct 2021 10:37 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(25 Oct 2021 11:27 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(25 Oct 2021 11:43 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
John Cowan
(25 Oct 2021 18:53 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited siiky (25 Oct 2021 20:26 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Amirouche BOUBEKKI
(26 Oct 2021 05:26 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Feeley
(26 Oct 2021 12:06 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(26 Oct 2021 12:17 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Feeley
(27 Oct 2021 14:13 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(27 Oct 2021 15:13 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(26 Oct 2021 07:14 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
John Cowan
(28 Oct 2021 00:48 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(28 Oct 2021 14:23 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
John Cowan
(28 Oct 2021 19:17 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(28 Oct 2021 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(29 Oct 2021 06:06 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(26 Oct 2021 07:27 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
John Cowan
(27 Oct 2021 15:35 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
John Cowan
(28 Oct 2021 00:31 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(28 Oct 2021 17:57 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Amirouche BOUBEKKI
(25 Oct 2021 11:12 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(25 Oct 2021 11:28 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
John Cowan
(28 Oct 2021 00:13 UTC)
|
Re: Iteration revisited
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(28 Oct 2021 17:38 UTC)
|
Hello, I use to lurk around here without chiming in, so pardon my intrusion :) I haven't followed the discussions of the mentioned SRFIs; maybe I'm missing some important pieces. > I am still waiting for empirical evidence that sequences like (list > (eof-object) ...) actually matter to anyone. Wondering whether it does matter to someone or not is not in my view a good criterion to cut corners. And excluding a possibly useful input value for no good reason isn't a _Good Thing_(TM). Might as well say that the identity function doesn't matter to anyone because it doesn't do anything. If I have a list of ports `l` and want to read the contents of all of them, `(map (cute read-string #f <>) l)` is one "obvious" way to go. Another probably better example is #f, although not related to generators & whatnot, which is commonly used as the "null value". Except when it is a valid input or output value. And that's why `maybe` from SRFI 189 is useful. siiky