Am Fr., 19. Aug. 2022 um 18:30 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>:

> > locative
> > ephemeron
> > assertion
> > violation
> > reference

I like these more than loc, eph, ass, vio, ref.

Or what do you have in mind?

PS I am not a native speaker of English, but I have never had a
problem with these "big" (by whatever metric) words. At least to me,
precision in wording is more important than brevity, so better use two
not-so-short words for two different things than to name the two
different things by the same short word. Personally, I think the
existing traditions in naming should also be respected if it makes
sense. E.g., R6RS makes the distinction between "errors" and
"violations" (in its condition hierarchy). When future Scheme
standards adopt this division, there are good reasons for sticking to
these established terms instead of calling these types, say, "user
error" and "programmer error", just to get rid of the "big" word
"violation".