|
The most general form of let/let*
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(15 Nov 2022 12:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Lassi Kortela
(15 Nov 2022 20:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Lassi Kortela
(15 Nov 2022 20:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(15 Nov 2022 20:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
John Cowan
(15 Nov 2022 20:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(15 Nov 2022 20:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(15 Nov 2022 20:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(15 Nov 2022 20:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Lassi Kortela
(16 Nov 2022 08:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Jeremy Steward
(17 Nov 2022 01:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Nov 2022 07:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Jeremy Steward
(17 Nov 2022 02:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let*
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(17 Nov 2022 07:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: The most general form of let/let* Lassi Kortela (17 Nov 2022 08:01 UTC)
|
> The relationship to Makefile syntax is that a topological sort is
> happening in the background.
Not only that, but the surface syntax has identical layout:
;; Scheme
(let ((d (using c
(k c)))
(a (f))
(c (using b
(h b)))
(b (g)))
<expr>)
## Make
d: c
k c
a:
f
c: b
h b
b:
g