|
Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Shawn Wagner
(19 Apr 2023 17:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Arthur A. Gleckler
(19 Apr 2023 21:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Shawn Wagner
(20 Apr 2023 00:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Lassi Kortela
(20 Apr 2023 09:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working. Lassi Kortela (20 Apr 2023 09:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(20 Apr 2023 09:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Shawn Wagner
(20 Apr 2023 09:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Arthur A. Gleckler
(22 Apr 2023 16:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Shawn Wagner
(20 Apr 2023 09:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(20 Apr 2023 09:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Shawn Wagner
(20 Apr 2023 10:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(20 Apr 2023 10:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Lassi Kortela
(20 Apr 2023 10:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Lassi Kortela
(20 Apr 2023 10:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Notes on trying to get srfi-tools working.
Lassi Kortela
(22 Apr 2023 05:47 UTC)
|
Regarding SRFI 227 (Optional Arguments): We have "vendored" a few dependencies into the srfi-tools source tree so that users wouldn't have to retrieve them from package managers. (As you experienced first hand, retrieving a set of dependencies across a range of Scheme implementations can be a burden.) IIRC, SRFI 227 can be implemented using syntax-rules so it's portable in principle. But the implementation is a substantial amount of code and we only make trivial use of it. IMHO it would be best if we could get by with a subset of the SRFI only.
