Repository of R7RS implementations and tests taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (24 Aug 2015 09:43 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
John Cowan
(24 Aug 2015 16:21 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Aug 2015 18:23 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(24 Aug 2015 19:00 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
John Cowan
(24 Aug 2015 21:25 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Aug 2015 21:39 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
John Cowan
(24 Aug 2015 22:04 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
Arthur A. Gleckler
(25 Aug 2015 00:01 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
Arthur A. Gleckler
(26 Aug 2015 19:17 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
Alex Shinn
(25 Aug 2015 00:34 UTC)
|
Re: Repository of R7RS implementations and tests
Arthur A. Gleckler
(25 Aug 2015 00:59 UTC)
|
Repository of R7RS implementations and tests taylanbayirli@xxxxxx 24 Aug 2015 09:43 UTC
Some time last year I started the following project, making significant progress: https://github.com/taylanub/scheme-srfis (It's stalled since a while, but I might pick it back up. Even better would be more contributors.) I think it would be great if this became an official part of the SRFI process. SRFIs should be implemented as R7RS libraries whenever possible, and perhaps more importantly, include a test suite! There is little code by me (mostly it's R7RS-ification of existing reference implementations) and I would be fine with relicensing all my code under the SRFI license, and giving the ownership of the project to the SRFI editors. What does everyone think? Taylan