|
Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Alpert Herb Petrofsky
(11 Jan 2005 21:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Bradd W. Szonye
(11 Jan 2005 21:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(11 Jan 2005 22:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Taylor Campbell
(12 Jan 2005 00:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Bradd W. Szonye
(12 Jan 2005 00:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Bradd W. Szonye (12 Jan 2005 00:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(17 Jan 2005 03:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Alpine Petrofsky
(12 Jan 2005 00:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 01:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 02:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 14:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 14:29 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Bradd W. Szonye 12 Jan 2005 00:16 UTC
Regarding the nesting rule: Perhaps it should be an error to write two #; tokens in a row? It's not something humans are likely to do, and since the syntax is for human convenience (not for macros) it's not something likely to come up in a macro transformer. That permits at least three implementations: 1. Signal an error. 2. Use the "logical" rule favored by current implementations. 3. Use the "intuitive" rule favored by Paul and I. -- Bradd W. Szonye http://www.szonye.com/bradd