Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Alpert Herb Petrofsky
(11 Jan 2005 21:03 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Bradd W. Szonye
(11 Jan 2005 21:19 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(11 Jan 2005 22:29 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Taylor Campbell
(12 Jan 2005 00:10 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Bradd W. Szonye
(12 Jan 2005 00:13 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Bradd W. Szonye
(12 Jan 2005 00:16 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(17 Jan 2005 03:03 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Alpine Petrofsky
(12 Jan 2005 00:22 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 01:45 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 02:18 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 14:11 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie (12 Jan 2005 14:29 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie 12 Jan 2005 14:29 UTC
Please note that this does does not require invasive the modification of the syntax of the language as alternative scoping semantics would; this specification only extends the definition of comment, and defines previously ambiguous reader-quote/etc. syntax/semantics. > And finally, slightly simpler: > > <comment> -> <datum-comment> | <empty-quote> | ; <all-chars-to-eol> > > <datum-comment> -> #; <datum-or-comment> > > <datum-or-comment> -> <datum> | <comment-or-empty> > > <comment-or-empty> -> <datum-comment> | <empty-quote> | <empty> > > <empty-quote> -> ' <comment-or-empty> > | ` <comment-or-empty> > | , <comment-or-empty> > | @, <comment-or-empty>