|
Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Alpert Herb Petrofsky
(11 Jan 2005 21:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Bradd W. Szonye
(11 Jan 2005 21:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(11 Jan 2005 22:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Taylor Campbell
(12 Jan 2005 00:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Bradd W. Szonye
(12 Jan 2005 00:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Bradd W. Szonye
(12 Jan 2005 00:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie (17 Jan 2005 03:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Alpine Petrofsky
(12 Jan 2005 00:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 01:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 02:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 14:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting
Paul Schlie
(12 Jan 2005 14:29 UTC)
|
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie 17 Jan 2005 03:03 UTC
As a last minute 2-cent thought, wonder if it may be better to use a symbol more closely already associated with reader list element modification such as @; to delete/comment-out an element, as @, evaluates/expands elements, rather than introduce one beginning with a # ? (but just a thought).