Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(27 Nov 2020 08:04 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(27 Nov 2020 16:12 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains? Alaric Snell-Pym (27 Nov 2020 16:39 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(27 Nov 2020 23:12 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(28 Nov 2020 03:08 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(28 Nov 2020 20:21 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(28 Nov 2020 22:30 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(28 Nov 2020 23:03 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(28 Nov 2020 23:23 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Alaric Snell-Pym
(29 Nov 2020 14:25 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(29 Nov 2020 14:59 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Alaric Snell-Pym
(29 Nov 2020 15:17 UTC)
|
Re: Who should maintain the RnRS subdomains?
Lassi Kortela
(29 Nov 2020 15:37 UTC)
|
On 27/11/2020 16:11, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote: > > I think we can collect the reports and their source code, but I don't think > we should create web sites for them. That would imply more authority about > them than we have. I suggest putting together one page or one domain, e.g. > standards.scheme.org, or using the history page/domain we discussed > earlier, and summarizing all the standards there, collecting the PDFs, > source code, mailing list archives, etc. In other words, concentrating on > collecting the historical record of them for preservation. > I'd like it to be easy to get copies of the recent actual standards first and foremost (ideally searchable and indexed HTML versions I can browse around easily!), with the history behind each and older standards available only a few clicks further away. -- Alaric Snell-Pym (M0KTN neé M7KIT) http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/