Re: Hosting and SEO for Scheme implementations
Jakub T. Jankiewicz 29 Dec 2020 17:20 UTC
> > Arthur, do you think we could we add implementation sites to that server
> > or is there a point to separating implementation sites to their own
> > servers?
> >
>
> It seems much easier to manage in the long run if implementations maintain
> their own separate servers. It really isn't expensive, especially compared
> to all the work required to create and maintain a good Scheme
> implementation.
The only reason why I use GitHub pages and js.org domain for my
implementation it's because I want my website to last. If I will be the only
maintainer of the project, I don't want my project be gone after I'm dead and
nobody can pay the bills for the server. It's not about money, but longevity I
hope that if scheme.org is maintained my community there will be someone that
will take over after for instance 20 years, and the site will keep working.
That's the power of GitHub pages it's GitHub is owned by Microsoft that will
most likely last even after 100 years if people will still be on earth then.
--
Jakub T. Jankiewicz, Web Developer
https://jcubic.pl/me