Please draft us a Scheme API
Lassi Kortela
(17 Sep 2019 18:54 UTC)
|
Re: Please draft us a Scheme API
John Cowan
(17 Sep 2019 19:08 UTC)
|
What should Hello World be like?
Lassi Kortela
(18 Sep 2019 08:41 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
Lassi Kortela
(18 Sep 2019 08:54 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
John Cowan
(19 Sep 2019 01:14 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
hga@xxxxxx
(19 Sep 2019 02:31 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
Lassi Kortela
(19 Sep 2019 15:35 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
Peter Bex
(19 Sep 2019 18:02 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
hga@xxxxxx
(19 Sep 2019 22:50 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
John Cowan
(19 Sep 2019 19:46 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
hga@xxxxxx
(19 Sep 2019 20:50 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
Lassi Kortela
(19 Sep 2019 21:14 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
Peter Bex
(20 Sep 2019 07:49 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
Alaric Snell-Pym
(20 Sep 2019 10:55 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
John Cowan
(20 Sep 2019 13:25 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
John Cowan
(20 Sep 2019 14:04 UTC)
|
Re: What should Hello World be like?
Lassi Kortela
(23 Sep 2019 10:54 UTC)
|
Connection strings, and representing them as lists Lassi Kortela (23 Sep 2019 10:57 UTC)
|
John's Simple SQL API
hga@xxxxxx
(19 Sep 2019 11:38 UTC)
|
Re: John's Simple SQL API
John Cowan
(19 Sep 2019 20:28 UTC)
|
Re: Please draft us a Scheme API
hga@xxxxxx
(17 Sep 2019 19:11 UTC)
|
Re: Please draft us a Scheme API
John Cowan
(17 Sep 2019 19:12 UTC)
|
Re: Please draft us a Scheme API
Lassi Kortela
(17 Sep 2019 19:32 UTC)
|
Re: Please draft us a Scheme API
John Cowan
(17 Sep 2019 19:35 UTC)
|
Re: Please draft us a Scheme API
Lassi Kortela
(17 Sep 2019 19:27 UTC)
|
> <https://www.connectionstrings.com/> makes it clear that > connection strings are de facto standardized Wow, that site is amazingly thorough. I had no idea the strings are that uniform. That's good news for us. > and that they are a flattening > of a string-to-string alist, which is how we should represent them in > Scheme. Not a p-list, because the keys frequently have spaces, and "..." > is easier and more portable than |...|. So I have made an alist the only > argument of open-sql-connection. Given that alists and plists, as well as symbols and strings, are perfectly round-trippable, I don't have much of an opinion on which flavor to choose. Alist with string keys is fine. I'll change the nascent IPC protocol's `connect` command to take a single alist argument as well.