3 databases in 3 days
hga@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2019 00:36 UTC)
|
Support for Scheme standards and implementations
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 08:11 UTC)
|
Re: Support for Scheme standards and implementations
hga@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2019 11:25 UTC)
|
Scheme implementations and portability
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 13:14 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme implementations and portability
John Cowan
(30 Sep 2019 19:27 UTC)
|
Scheme implementations, portability, FFIs
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 21:16 UTC)
|
Re: Scheme implementations, portability, FFIs
John Cowan
(30 Sep 2019 22:10 UTC)
|
JDBC
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 13:15 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC
hga@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2019 13:24 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC and subprocess protocol
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 14:29 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC and subprocess protocol
hga@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2019 15:16 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC and subprocess protocol
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 15:47 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC and subprocess protocol
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 15:55 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC
John Cowan
(30 Sep 2019 15:10 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 15:26 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 15:34 UTC)
|
sdbi design in detail and MariaDB CONNECT
hga@xxxxxx
(30 Sep 2019 16:14 UTC)
|
Re: sdbi design in detail and MariaDB CONNECT
Lassi Kortela
(30 Sep 2019 16:28 UTC)
|
Re: sdbi design in detail and MariaDB CONNECT
John Cowan
(30 Sep 2019 20:25 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC
John Cowan
(30 Sep 2019 16:44 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC Lassi Kortela (30 Sep 2019 20:52 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC
Alaric Snell-Pym
(01 Oct 2019 09:26 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC
hga@xxxxxx
(01 Oct 2019 09:55 UTC)
|
Re: JDBC
Alaric Snell-Pym
(01 Oct 2019 11:09 UTC)
|
sdbi supports "databases" with text query languages that return rectangular results
hga@xxxxxx
(01 Oct 2019 12:22 UTC)
|
Re: sdbi supports "databases" with text query languages that return rectangular results
John Cowan
(01 Oct 2019 16:10 UTC)
|
>> A JDBC suprocess is a >> matter of coding one, so it's the problem of whoever will code it :) >> Where's the harm if someone does the work? > > There isn't; I'm just concerned about spending our limited total available > time/effort on things that don't actually have to be done. But if you are > fired up about it, far be it from me to stop you. That's a good concern to have. We are doing very many with very few people. However, a subprocess driver can be written in a high-level language in a matter of hours. C took a day because it's C. Of course, ongoing maintenance takes a nonzero amount of time too, but it's a drop in the bucket compared to everything else we do. Even the C drivers are fast to update once the S-expression plumbing is in place. I haven't had any substantial problems with them yet. Just looked up JDBC's Wikipedia page and there's a bridge to access ODBC via JDBC, lol. So we come full circle to the start of this mailing list. Of course, there is probably JDBC and ODBC access to MariaDB CONNECT...