Draft updated SRFI-110 and reference implementation

Show/hide message thread

Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? David A. Wheeler (09 Apr 2013 21:56 UTC)

Re: Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? Mark H Weaver (09 Apr 2013 23:35 UTC)

Re: Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? David A. Wheeler (10 Apr 2013 00:14 UTC)

Re: Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? David A. Wheeler (10 Apr 2013 00:24 UTC)

Re: Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? David A. Wheeler (10 Apr 2013 04:11 UTC)

Re: Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? John Cowan (10 Apr 2013 01:56 UTC)

Re: Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? David A. Wheeler (10 Apr 2013 03:00 UTC)

Re: Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? John Cowan (10 Apr 2013 06:29 UTC)

Re: Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? David A. Wheeler (11 Apr 2013 02:26 UTC)

Re: Should we MAY a "curly-write" and "neoteric-write"? Or even "sweet-write"? David A. Wheeler (11 Apr 2013 22:37 UTC)

First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions David A. Wheeler (14 Apr 2013 22:29 UTC)

Draft updated SRFI-110 and reference implementation David A. Wheeler (15 Apr 2013 04:09 UTC)

Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin (02 May 2013 08:00 UTC)

Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions David A. Wheeler (02 May 2013 22:46 UTC)

Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions David A. Wheeler (14 May 2013 00:47 UTC)

Draft updated SRFI-110 and reference implementation David A. Wheeler 15 Apr 2013 04:09 UTC

Show/hide attachments

Here's a draft updated SRFI-110 (now implementations MUST implement curly-write and neoteric-write), along with an updated reference implementation (I moved the "write" code into it, for -simple, -cyclic, and -shared).  The SRFI-110.html file passes the W3C validator.

I intend to ask the editors to post this as an update - any concerns?

--- David A. Wheeler