Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

The ". $" notation (was: Re: how useful are collecting lists?) Alan Manuel Gloria (18 Mar 2013 01:26 UTC)
Re: The ". $" notation Shiro Kawai (18 Mar 2013 02:42 UTC)
Re: The ". $" notation Alan Manuel Gloria (18 Mar 2013 02:44 UTC)
Re: The ". $" notation Shiro Kawai (18 Mar 2013 04:45 UTC)
Re: The ". $" notation David A. Wheeler (18 Mar 2013 16:25 UTC)
Re: The ". $" notation Alan Manuel Gloria (19 Mar 2013 00:17 UTC)
Re: The ". $" notation David A. Wheeler (19 Mar 2013 03:28 UTC)
Re: The ". $" notation Alan Manuel Gloria (19 Mar 2013 05:52 UTC)
Re: The ". $" notation David A. Wheeler (19 Mar 2013 10:44 UTC)
Handling scomments after "." David A. Wheeler (19 Mar 2013 03:41 UTC)
Re: Handling scomments after "." David A. Wheeler (19 Mar 2013 04:12 UTC)

Re: The ". $" notation David A. Wheeler 19 Mar 2013 10:44 UTC

Alan Manuel Gloria:
> Err mostly I was pointing out that this is actually an inconsistency -
> SUBLIST normally does not wrap a single datum after it in an extra
> layer of parens, while "." essentially removes an extra layer of
> parens.  So maybe ". $" notation isn't as good as I thought.

I'd be happy to get rid of it. It doesn't add any real capabilities to the notation,
and it's nice to have a warning-free grammar.

So... if someone *wants* ". $" notation, please speak up ASAP.
Otherwise, I'll just remove it soon.

But this expedition *did* end up pointing out a grammar problem, namely,
that we weren't supporting scomments after period.  So it was still worthwhile.

--- David A. Wheeler