Mark H Weaver:
> you're rocking the boat in
> more ways than necessary in your presentation of this SRFI, and I
> suspect that it will have a negative effect on how well this SRFI is
> received by the average Schemer.

That's a compelling argument, thanks.   I've changed the abstract in the
currently-posted SRFI, and the next draft of the SRFI will change all
the "if"s the same way.

--- David A. Wheeler