|
make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last
Takashi Kato
(04 Dec 2014 19:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last
Shiro Kawai
(04 Dec 2014 20:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last
John Cowan
(05 Dec 2014 12:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last John Cowan (05 Dec 2014 12:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last
Kevin Wortman
(05 Dec 2014 20:43 UTC)
|
|
New release of SRFI 117
John Cowan
(06 Dec 2014 02:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: New release of SRFI 117
Takashi Kato
(06 Dec 2014 09:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: New release of SRFI 117
John Cowan
(06 Dec 2014 17:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: New release of SRFI 117
Kevin Wortman
(06 Dec 2014 22:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: New release of SRFI 117
John Cowan
(06 Dec 2014 22:52 UTC)
|
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last John Cowan 05 Dec 2014 12:36 UTC
Takashi Kato scripsit: > (make-queue-with-list first [last]) Sounds good. I'll make this change later. > Beside this, the description of `make-queue-with-list` seems forcing > implementations to use a list as its storage. I think this is a bit > over specifying. That is deliberate: this is a SRFI for list-based queues. I'm perfectly willing to rename the SRFI itself, but I'd like input on how to rename the procedures, if at all. If they keep "queue", it may be confusing if there is another queue SRFI (there will be, as I mentioned, a SRFI from Kevin Wortman that includes deques based on finger trees). -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org Wer es in kleinen Dingen mit der Wahrheit nicht ernst nimmt, dem kann man auch in grossen Dingen nicht vertrauen. --Albert Einstein on honesty