|
make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last
Takashi Kato
(04 Dec 2014 19:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last
Shiro Kawai
(04 Dec 2014 20:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last
John Cowan
(05 Dec 2014 12:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last
John Cowan
(05 Dec 2014 12:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last
Kevin Wortman
(05 Dec 2014 20:43 UTC)
|
|
New release of SRFI 117
John Cowan
(06 Dec 2014 02:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: New release of SRFI 117
Takashi Kato
(06 Dec 2014 09:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: New release of SRFI 117 John Cowan (06 Dec 2014 17:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: New release of SRFI 117
Kevin Wortman
(06 Dec 2014 22:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: New release of SRFI 117
John Cowan
(06 Dec 2014 22:52 UTC)
|
Re: New release of SRFI 117 John Cowan 06 Dec 2014 17:27 UTC
Takashi Kato scripsit: > Shouldn't `queue?` be `list-queue?`? Fixed, thanks. > And is there a reason why there is no `list-queue->list` to > return newly allocated list? Though, it might be just one liner > like this: > > (list-copy (list-queue-list q)) Just so. In general, I tried to avoid adding these one-liners. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org Clear? Huh! Why a four-year-old child could understand this report. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head or tail out of it. --Rufus T. Firefly on government reports