make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last Takashi Kato (04 Dec 2014 19:37 UTC)
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last Shiro Kawai (04 Dec 2014 20:15 UTC)
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last John Cowan (05 Dec 2014 12:39 UTC)
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last John Cowan (05 Dec 2014 12:36 UTC)
Re: make-queue-with-list and make-queue-with-first-last Kevin Wortman (05 Dec 2014 20:43 UTC)
New release of SRFI 117 John Cowan (06 Dec 2014 02:00 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 117 Takashi Kato (06 Dec 2014 09:27 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 117 John Cowan (06 Dec 2014 17:27 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 117 Kevin Wortman (06 Dec 2014 22:39 UTC)
Re: New release of SRFI 117 John Cowan (06 Dec 2014 22:52 UTC)

Re: New release of SRFI 117 John Cowan 06 Dec 2014 17:27 UTC

Takashi Kato scripsit:

> Shouldn't `queue?` be `list-queue?`?

Fixed, thanks.

> And is there a reason why there is no `list-queue->list` to
> return newly allocated list? Though, it might be just one liner
> like this:
>
> (list-copy (list-queue-list q))

Just so.  In general, I tried to avoid adding these one-liners.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
Clear?  Huh!  Why a four-year-old child could understand this report.
Run out and find me a four-year-old child.  I can't make head or tail
out of it.        --Rufus T. Firefly on government reports