Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting
John Cowan 08 Jun 2016 17:30 UTC
Per Bothner scripsit:
> We're not talking "portable". We're talking R7RS-large. At least I am.
ATM we are talking SRFI 135.
> If "portable" is a constraint, the obviously literal «foo» isn't an option either.
True, but it's less necessary.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org
Kill Gorgun! Kill orc-folk! No other words please Wild Men. Drive away
bad air and darkness with bright iron! --Ghan-buri-Ghan