Re: any feedback on SRFI-163 (array literals)? Bradley Lucier 15 Nov 2018 00:45 UTC
On 11/14/18 5:28 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
> How about:
> In an implementation where vector is a subtype of array (which is
> recommended), rank-1
> arrays with zero lower bound should be printed as vectors, though
> an exception may be
> made for a specified subset of non-simple vectors (such as shared
In an implementation where vector is a subtype of array, rank-1
arrays with zero lower bound may be printed as vectors.
That seems to be more along the lines of what Shiro Kawai was saying.
I'll look more at it soon.