Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

any feedback on SRFI-163 (array literals)? Per Bothner (14 Nov 2018 18:53 UTC)
Re: any feedback on SRFI-163 (array literals)? Shiro Kawai (14 Nov 2018 21:16 UTC)
Re: any feedback on SRFI-163 (array literals)? Per Bothner (14 Nov 2018 22:28 UTC)
Re: any feedback on SRFI-163 (array literals)? Bradley Lucier (15 Nov 2018 00:45 UTC)
Re: any feedback on SRFI-163 (array literals)? Shiro Kawai (16 Nov 2018 00:39 UTC)

Re: any feedback on SRFI-163 (array literals)? Bradley Lucier 15 Nov 2018 00:45 UTC

On 11/14/18 5:28 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
> How about:
>
>      In an implementation where vector is a subtype of array (which is
> recommended), rank-1
>      arrays with zero lower bound should be printed as vectors, though
> an exception may be
>      made for a specified subset of non-simple vectors (such as shared
> vectors).

Perhaps

     In an implementation where vector is a subtype of array, rank-1
arrays with zero lower bound may be printed as vectors.

That seems to be more along the lines of what Shiro Kawai was saying.

I'll look more at it soon.

Brad