|
s7 suggestion bil@xxxxxx (29 Oct 2019 13:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
Lassi Kortela
(29 Oct 2019 15:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
bil@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2019 15:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
Lassi Kortela
(29 Oct 2019 16:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
Lassi Kortela
(29 Oct 2019 16:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
bil@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2019 17:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
Lassi Kortela
(29 Oct 2019 18:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
John Cowan
(01 Nov 2019 21:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 21:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
John Cowan
(01 Nov 2019 23:03 UTC)
|
|
&key vs :key in the lambda list
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 23:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: &key vs :key in the lambda list
John Cowan
(01 Nov 2019 23:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: &key vs :key in the lambda list
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 23:27 UTC)
|
|
Syntax for hygienic vs non-hygienic keywords
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 23:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: allow-other-keys
bil@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2019 19:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(29 Oct 2019 16:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
Lassi Kortela
(29 Oct 2019 16:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: s7 suggestion
bil@xxxxxx
(29 Oct 2019 17:10 UTC)
|
|
Including 177 in s7?
Lassi Kortela
(29 Oct 2019 17:34 UTC)
|
Thank you for including s7 in srfi-177. I thought you might like an
hygenic
version of that code:
(define-macro (keyword-lambda formals-and-keys . body)
((lambda (formals keyword-symbols)
`(with-let (unlet) ; or (inlet (unlet)) -- more explicit
(lambda* (,@formals ,@(map (lambda (sym) `(,sym #f))
keyword-symbols))
,@body)))
(split-last formals-and-keys)))
I think the keyword-call macro is already hygienic. "with-let"
evaluates its body in the given environment. s7 has
first-class environments, so it doesn't need define-syntax and
its friends.
Here are tests, similar to yours:
(define (writeln x) (write x) (newline))
(let ((lambda* gcd)
(list abs)
(a 321)
(split-last 42)
(cond if))
(define y (keyword-lambda (a b (c d)) (list a b c d)))
(writeln (y 1 2))
(writeln (keyword-call y 1 2 ()))
(writeln (keyword-call y 1 2 (c 3)))
(writeln (keyword-call y 1 2 (d 4 c 3))))
(set! list abs)
(define z (keyword-lambda (a b (c d)) (list a b c d)))
(writeln (z 1 2))
(writeln (keyword-call z 1 2 ()))
(writeln (keyword-call z 1 2 (c 3)))
(writeln (keyword-call z 1 2 (d 4 c 3))))
Please let me know if I've missed something!