Am Mo., 11. Mai 2020 um 20:02 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>: > I agree that the proposed SRFI is an excellent idea, especially with the additional macros to go from lists/vectors to multiple values. Indeed, given such a SRFI, I question whether SRFI 195 actually adds anything. It seems simpler just to continue to restrict boxes to hold a single object which can be converted to and from multiple values. It's a different abstraction. Furthermore, in Schemes where a multiple box is implemented through native reified multiple values, it would less efficient to put a, say, vector in a box holding exactly one value.
