Re: Introspection Lassi Kortela 12 May 2020 18:46 UTC
> We don't have a good convention for distinguishing variables from syntax > keywords, except that define- is normally syntax. The idea is to > introduce a kind of arrow for syntax representing a conversion. Is it not good enough to re-use the `->` arrow we already have? Syntax ought to be needed mainly for multiple values and for places (generalized `set!`). Other conversions can be procedures. And even the syntax looks like a procedure call, so it's interchangeable except for not being first-class.