On 2020-08-28 19:03 +0200, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> And what do you think of my vector->range proposal? I find it rather obvious.

While I'm not sure I see much utility in vector->range (SRFI 133
provides many ways of iterating over vectors) I think we may want this
and other X->range conversions.  As SRFI 196 has already passed the
90-day mark, though, I propose that these be specified in a
supplemental ranges SRFI.  I'd also like to see ways to compose
ranges--e.g. a range-product function for producing the product of a
set of ranges--in such a SRFI.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"In the presence of the unknown all have an equal right to
think." --Robert G. Ingersoll, "Individuality"