Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 28 Aug 2020 21:10 UTC

Am Fr., 28. Aug. 2020 um 22:45 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>:
>
> Draft #5 is now up and hopefully resolves your concerns, so barring an emergency stop, Arthur will finalize on Monday.

Yes, thank both of you, John and Wolfgang. Everything has been
resolved perfectly. :)

(As I have raised it on this list: could you give a use case for
ranges where they cannot be efficiently replaced with generators?)

Have a nice weekend,

Marc

PS The addition of vector->range would have been a nice showcase (and
helpful for constructing non-numeric ranges) but in no way essential.