Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? John Cowan (27 Aug 2020 23:05 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (28 Aug 2020 02:12 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (28 Aug 2020 03:33 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Aug 2020 06:31 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (28 Aug 2020 16:01 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Aug 2020 16:28 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (28 Aug 2020 16:59 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Aug 2020 17:03 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (28 Aug 2020 18:10 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Aug 2020 18:54 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (29 Aug 2020 17:29 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (29 Aug 2020 17:44 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? John Cowan (30 Aug 2020 00:12 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Aug 2020 08:54 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (30 Aug 2020 17:02 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Aug 2020 17:39 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? John Cowan (30 Aug 2020 18:21 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (30 Aug 2020 18:46 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Aug 2020 19:30 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (30 Aug 2020 20:40 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Aug 2020 20:44 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (30 Aug 2020 20:56 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Aug 2020 21:07 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? John Cowan (30 Aug 2020 21:08 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (31 Aug 2020 02:40 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? John Cowan (31 Aug 2020 12:50 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (31 Aug 2020 16:30 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (30 Aug 2020 21:08 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Aug 2020 21:15 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (30 Aug 2020 21:29 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (28 Aug 2020 18:13 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Aug 2020 18:55 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? John Cowan (28 Aug 2020 20:45 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Aug 2020 21:11 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? John Cowan (29 Aug 2020 00:43 UTC)
Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (29 Aug 2020 08:21 UTC)

Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 31 Aug 2020 02:40 UTC

On 2020-08-30 17:07 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> It does to me.  Can you propose appropriate language for the SRFI?

I think the current wording needs only a slight change in emphasis.
Instead of

    "Returns a range/list/vector of the results of applying *proc*
    to each element of *range* in order.",

it may be sufficient to write

    "Applies *proc* to each element of *range* in order and returns a
    range/list/vector of the results.".

The latter suggests (to me, at least) that evaluating the applications
of *proc* should not be deferred.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"If one is searching for a needle in a haystack, look in the part
of the haystack that contains more needles." --Bird & Wadler