Re: Eliminate numeric-range over inexact numbers?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 31 Aug 2020 02:40 UTC
On 2020-08-30 17:07 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> It does to me. Can you propose appropriate language for the SRFI?
I think the current wording needs only a slight change in emphasis.
Instead of
"Returns a range/list/vector of the results of applying *proc*
to each element of *range* in order.",
it may be sufficient to write
"Applies *proc* to each element of *range* in order and returns a
range/list/vector of the results.".
The latter suggests (to me, at least) that evaluating the applications
of *proc* should not be deferred.
--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>
"If one is searching for a needle in a haystack, look in the part
of the haystack that contains more needles." --Bird & Wadler