Named procedure; RE: SRFI 197: Threading Macros
Arne Babenhauserheide 09 Jun 2020 13:40 UTC
Hi,
I like the idea of these pipeline processings a lot, but I expect that
the usage of -> as symbol would decrease readability and accessibility
of code a lot. Also -> already has meaning within Scheme as conversion
between types, e.g. number->string.
Could that syntax be optional with a simple named version as base case?
This could for example be:
pipeline pipeline-last as-pipeline some-pipeline some-pipeline-last
cond-pipeline lambda-pipeline.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken