Named procedure; RE: SRFI 197: Threading Macros Arne Babenhauserheide 09 Jun 2020 13:40 UTC

Hi,

I like the idea of these pipeline processings a lot, but I expect that
the usage of -> as symbol would decrease readability and accessibility
of code a lot. Also -> already has meaning within Scheme as conversion
between types, e.g. number->string.

Could that syntax be optional with a simple named version as base case?

This could for example be:

pipeline pipeline-last as-pipeline some-pipeline some-pipeline-last
cond-pipeline lambda-pipeline.

Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken